Thread
:
Opinions Wanted - Arrow, Archer, 182, 177RG, Early 210's
View Single Post
#
2
January 18th 04, 11:06 PM
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
Posts: n/a
(Larryskydives) wrote:
I am selling my 1956 172, and will be in the amrket to purchase
another plane. I am really leaning towards a 1968 - 1970 Arrow.
However , have seen a couple of Archers that look interesting.
Why are you getting rid of the 172?
My club has a 1968 Arrow (180 HP engine) and several Archers of various
vintages. Personally, I don't see much reason to pick the Arrow over
the Archer. The Arrow carries less useful load, has a smaller CG range,
costs more to maintain (retractable gear and constant speed prop), and
offers very little in the way of additional speed (maybe 10 extra kts).
The insurance on an Arrow will probably be more than the Archer, because
of the retractable gear.
There is very little that's sexy about an Archer, but it's a simple,
easy to fly, practical airplane for somebody who doesn't worry much
about going fast.
Roy Smith