(AJ) writes:

I've generally found that when a public utility such as an airport
is criticized as unprofitable, the public officials usually have
another use in mind for that land. I hate to be pessimistic, but
most times its a foregone conclusion that the airport is a goner.

That's why I suggested getting a coalition of business owners together
to take control of the airport now, before any ideas like that are
fully-formed -- offer the city $100 for a 99-year least and promise to
handle future operating costs (but not the existing debt, of course).
If it makes life easier, call it an "airport industrial park".


All the best,


David

--
David Megginson, , http://www.megginson.com/