View Single Post
  #7  
Old December 27th 03, 05:11 PM
Chuck Gerlach
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think its one thing to have reporting points that are confusing and quite
another to use these points in a TFR NOTAM. You can ask for help when in
the air and given a "unique" reporting point. Who do you ask for
clarification of a NOTAM? Unless you are talking to a FSS with local
Chicago knowledge, you are out of luck.

Another interesting point is how does ATC know where the TFR is? Does ATC
have streets on their scopes?

It's all silly and an encrediable waste. It doesn't make me or anyone else
any safer. Another example of perception being more important than reality.

Chuck Gerlach

"Rob Perkins" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 05:47:24 GMT, "Chuck Gerlach"
wrote:


Does anyone else think references to the EISENHOWER, DAN RYAN and KENNEDY
expressways are silly since aviation charts don't have these references?

I
had to pull out the State Farm Road Atlas to find references to these

names.

I think the references themselves are remarkably provincial. As a
visitor to Chicago I just plain *couldn't tell* what the radio traffic
reports were about, even though I knew the expressway numbers around
the area.

And you forgot the EDENS.

Rob :-)