View Single Post
  #35  
Old January 14th 04, 06:02 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bill Denton" wrote in message
...
|
| When I first read 91.126 I thought it was either a poorly-written or
| extremely loose reg. But since I'm new to the world of FAR/AIM's I figured
| I'd learn about it when I needed to.
|
| But in response to your post I did a little digging, and determined that
the
| problem is that 91.126 is being misinterpreted!
|

Steve, bless his heart, just likes being a little bit obtuse from time to
time. I love his posts. He is conveniently ignoring the "unless otherwise
authorized" clause in the reg. The 45 degree entry is "otherwise
authorized." The AIM specifically states that pilots following the
recommendations in it provide a safe harbor against violation of the
regulations and that all procedures in it are approved by the Administrator.
The AIM is also signed by the Administrator saying that the procedures in it
are authorized.