"Ron Natalie" wrote in message ...
I was
commenting on Brien's (the post I was immediately following up)
odd statement that "Since the tire place does not own the aircraft, you would
be 'holding out to others.'" Which we would both agree isn't true.

That's a pretty common definition of holding out to others in other
contexts, but apparently not the one described in the advisory
circular, which I didn't realize. I stand corrected, and also agree
that it isn't true.

There are certain private carriages (larger aircraft) that must play the part 119 game, but in general no.

119.23(b) indicates that Mark would still have to play a large part of
the Part 119 and Part 135 game, i.e. be "certifiable" under part 119
and conduct operations in accordance with part 135 (including
limitations and qualifications). Is there another AC that I haven't
read that contradicts this? ;-)