"Dale" wrote in message
...
In article .net,
"Chuck" wrote:



I don't see that, but I'll take your word for it...


The one's still flying are considered GA now.

And this is rec.aviation....not rec.generalaviation g

--


After I sent the previous message, I guess that a B-17 would almost have to
be considered general aviation, as I can't think of any other category to
place it in.

Sorry about that.

But...eventhough the name of the newsgroup isn't rec.generalaviation , it
does have a charter and the charter specifically states that this newsgroup
is general aviation.

Here is a bit of the charter:


************************************************** *****************
* Information pertinent to pilots of general aviation aircraft
* which would not fall into one of the other non-misc
* rec.aviation groups. Topics include, but are not limited to
* flying skills, interesting sights, destinations, flight
* characteristics of aircraft, unusual situations, handling
* emergencies, working with air traffic control, international
* flights, customs and immigration, experiences with
* ground support facilities, etc.


************************************************** *****************

Remember.. the keyword is general aviation.