I did not specify which killing was and which killing was not.

That is clear, and the reason I asked the question of you. From your
less than informative reply, I will conclude that you decline further
clarification of when you meant to imply.


Yes, I decline to elaborate (as to exactly which killings constitute murder)
because
1: it is not relevant to the newsgroup. (in fact, even this post is way OT)
2: it would serve primatily to inflame rather than inform, because there is no
"line" between good and evil, just a gradation (and sometimes it's not even
that clear)
3: the answer (or my answer anyway) isn't interesting, rather, the reasoning
that leads to the conclusion is what is interesting. That discussion can go on
forever.

My main point was just that the question isn't as simple as the answer that was
presented.

Jose


--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)