Pat Russell wrote:

What if security were not an issue?

I beginning to think I don't understand the question. Hypothetically,
the manufacturer retires, yet everyone, including GFAC, IGC, all the
other manufacturers, and the users, agree that the unit still meets
these requirements:

-there is a reliable agent that can inspect the flight recorder for
signs of tampering
-it can answer critics with questions about the security of algorithms
-it can maintain the security keys

And yet, the unit is prohibited from world record use?

Is this the question?

--
-----
Replace "SPAM" with "charter" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA