B Lacovara wrote:

The boats built today are using 4th and 5th
generation gel coat formulations that are fairly sophisticated. One small boat
company in the U.S. will use more gel coat than the entire glider industry.

Gliders, on the other hand, use polyester gel coat and an epoxy laminating
resin substrate. The resulting bond is an *ADHESIVE* force. The state-of-cure
of the gel coat applied in the mold at the time of laminate application is
critical to the bond. This is a complex interplay involving initiator level,
temperature, time, gel coat thickness, and other factors. There is an optimal
cure-state window for development of maximum bonding between the cured gel coat
and the laminate. At best, the adhesive bond between polyester and epoxy will
not produce as much energy as a polyester to polyester cohesive bond. The gel
coat typically used on gliders is the same basic 2nd or 3rd generation
technology as used on boats in the '70's and '80's. Also, there is
considerably more surface movement on a thin skinned glider laminate as
compared to a much thicker boat laminate.

Would gliders avoid the problem if they used the 4th and 5th generation
gel coat formulations? If so, why have the glider companies chosen to
use an older technology?