Smitty wrote:
I'm getting a really bad feeling about EAA in
it's present format.
Now, can anyone comment on the SAA?
It's not actually comparable to EAA. There is no chapter network,
no formal support structure. There is a nice magazine. They are
not out to make a big impact on sport aviation. It's a bunch of
old timers and grass roots type that get together once a year
at a fly-in. Maybe they will have more.
I joined and support SAA because it's my way to say thanks
to Paul and because the flyin is only 40 miles from my airstrip.
I see the SAA as a group of friends and fans of the EAA founder
and folks who support the original idea. There are no vendors
or commercialism at the fly-in. It's completely different than
Oshkosh.
--Dan Grunloh
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 23:23:53 -0800, "RST Engineering"
wrote:
I'm sure if you wrote EAA and asked for "the AoA project that you screwed a
good designer out of" that they would be overjoyed to provide you a copy of
the design.
Jim
"David Bridgham" wrote in message
...
"RST Engineering" writes:
Another colleague of mine submitted a particularly clever electronic
angle
of attack indicator that could be made for peanuts.
I'm intrigued. Do you know if the information on this AoA indicator
system is available? Not that I'm not interested in your low fuel
detector as well.
-Dave
|