Nope. Merely commenting on how people can declare themselves expert enough
to comment on the actions of others with only partial information and
insufficient relevant experience. Sorry it doesn't make for interesting
debating but that's how I see it.

Shawn
"Doug Carter" wrote in message
om...
ShawnD2112 wrote:

...there is no reason to publish further details as the outcome was not
unsafe...

Darn, you could have saved a lot of valuable bandwidth and potential
confusion to the FAA & JAA (whom no doubt depend on Usenet as a primary
data source) if you had informed us of this fundamental truth a couple of
days ago.


Others, like Larry D. and Doug C., have proven themselves unworthy
adversaries in the debate on the issue.

Aw shucks Shawn, are you going to hold Usenet to the rigorous reporting
and analysis standards of professional icons like CBS, CNN, BBC or perhaps
the LA Times?

But, upon reflection, perhaps "dumb as a bag of rocks" *is* too harsh;
I'll go with "dumb as a bag of hammers" instead.