View Single Post
  #50  
Old August 7th 03, 01:57 AM
RobertR237
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(pac plyer) writes:


Dan,

Sorry about making you my target earlier, did not refer to you as a
"net nazi", was just pointing out that we are unmoderated here and
have been knee-deep in self-anoited netcops for years. I hope there's
no hard feelings.

As you know, there is another catagory of clearance that cannot be
discussed. Perhaps that is why O-rings used the lower "top secret."
Unless that rule has changed since I held a DOD top secret clearance.

pacplyer - out



I can assure that a "Top Secret" clearance is only the tip of the iceburg and
there are many levels beyond that. Top Secret is a general category which is
only the beginning point. Levels beyond that are much more specific in nature
and are based on the "Need to Know" requirements. The Top Secret clearance
requires an extensive background investigation but not nearly as extensive as
the higher clearances. The government performed a total of four background
investigations on me when I was in the Air Force with each being more detailed
than the prior. They don't give those clearances to you if you have even a
hint of a problem.


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)