I'm trying to remember where I saw one of these. I believe that it was
in either UT or CA, but can't recall which airport.
In the meantime, the instructions to procedure developers indicate what
note to place on the procedure when this situation occurs, and can be
read at the following website;
http://av-info.faa.gov/terps/Directi...19C%20CHG3.pdf
(page 107 of 201)
Para 854 m(6)(e) states

(e) When terrain, obstacles, descent
gradient, etc., do not allow the use of a LOC procedure
associated with the ILS when the GS is not used, place
NA in the visibility column for each LOC category
affected. If, in such an instance, another procedure must
be used instead, enter the following in the NOTES
section: "Chart planview note: When GS not used, use
LOC RWY 26 procedure." When circling is authorized,
but the LOC procedure associated with the ILS is "NA,"
enter the following in the NOTES section: "Chart note:
Circling requires descent on GS to MDA."

JPH

wrote:
Can you give us some examples?
Stan

On Tue, 03 May 2005 20:04:24 -0500, J Haggerty
wrote:


There are actually a few ILS procedures that do not have LOC minima.
That would normally be caused by very high obstacles that would keep the
LOC MDA too high, but are not high enough to penetrate the precision
obstacle clearance slope.