View Single Post
  #33  
Old July 30th 03, 09:38 PM
Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sydney Hoeltzli wrote
Julian Scarfe wrote:
Well yes, but solving the roll problem and getting the wings level will
solve the pitch problem. Solving the pitch problem doesn't solve the roll
problem.


I'll have to try this again next time I'm out playing, but I guess I'm
trying to say (at least in my plane) I don't think they're separable.
That is to say it's not enough to *get* the wings level, if the pitch
is oscillating a wing will drop. (this is a practical observation)


I have another practical observation. If an unusual attitude has
developed, then even regaining perfect control over roll may not
salvage the situation. I tried this experiment once (link and text at
end of post).

Pitch stability is one of those terms that doesn't necessarily have
any meaning outside of control theory. Inside of control theory it's
too dull to think

No, seriously - positive dynamic pitch stability, as it's generally
understood, basically means that if you have the plane trimmed out to
a certain speed, and then make a step change to that speed, the plane
will undergo some oscillations but eventually return to the trim
speed, within a certain tolerance. However, it's pretty obvious that
it won't do that for arbitrarily large step changes. The magnitude of
the step change is defined by certification rules - and if you've
allowed the speed to diverge outside those limits, then even if you
bring roll under control you're still a test pilot.

Michael

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...3D30%26hl%3Den

One piece of advice that non-instrument pilots are always given should
they blunder into IMC inadvertently is to turn on the autopilot if
they have one. The reason is obvious - an autopilot, assuming it
works properly, will maintain wings level in the clouds whereas an
untrained person may not. Makes sense, right?

I've never owned a plane with an autopilot, and when I did
inadvertently blunder into IMC I kept the plane under control and flew
RADAR vectors based on the training all private pilots get in basic
attitude instrument flying. But what if I had an autopilot?

Recently I installed an Autocontrol III in my Twin Comanche. I tested
it in both wing level mode and heading hold mode (it has no altitude
hold) and I was satisfied that it would be a good tool for reducing my
workload at night or in IMC. But would it help the untrained pilot in
IMC?

So I tested it under nearly ideal conditions. I had the plane loaded
about 400 lbs under gross, and with the cg toward the forward part of
the envelope for good stability. I slowed the plane to about 120 kts,
trimmed it up, and released the controls at a safe altitude. I wanted
to see what would happen. For a minute or so, the plane wandered in
heading but continued to hold altitude (plus or minus a bit - there
were some bumps) and wings mostly level. Eventually, of course, it
got a wing lifted by a bump, and off it went into a graveyard spiral.
At 50 degrees of bank, the speed had built to about 160 kts and the
descent rate was over 1000 fpm. I decided that this was a classic
nose-low unusual attitude. So I engaged the autopilot in wing leveler
mode.

Immediately and smoothly, the autopilot leveled the wings. So far, so
good. The airplane immediately began to climb and slow down. "Wow,
this actually works!" I thought. Not so fast. The airplane blew
right through its trim speed, and the nose kept coming up. The wings
did stay approximately level, and the heading stayed pretty constant,
but airspeed bled off. I put my hand on the throttles, sensing what
was coming. Sure enough, I was slowing right through red line. The
power setting I used was low enough for a power-on stall, and the
altitude was high enough, so I kept my feet lightly on the rudders,
ready to recover. The plane slowed through 65 mph (power-off stall is
over 70) and then nosed down and dove. At the bottom of the dive, I
think it may have been doing even more than 160 kts - but then it
began to climb again. At the top, I felt the bite of the stall, but
before I could take action the nose dropped again. Still the wings
were level.

As the nose began to drop again, I lost my nerve. As the nose crossed
the horizon, I held the yoke for a few seconds to hold that attitude.
Then I let go. The plane flew, holding wings level and maintaining
altitude reasonably well in the bumps.

Maybe it's a good thing I had the instrument rating and the confidence
to use it before I had an autopilot...

Michael