xyzzy wrote:

The real result of such a successful legal challenge is likely to be the
elimination and/or curtailment of hangar rentals at the airport in
question, not the airport in quesiton giving up a liability coverage
they have come to rely on.

If you seriously think that any airport in this neck of the woods is going to
give up the $450/month or so rent on each of their hangars just because some
judge says they have to go back to dealing with insurance the way they dealt
with it a few years ago, you really have a screw loose.

George Patterson
"Naked" means you ain't got no clothes on; "nekkid" means you ain't got
no clothes on - and are up to somethin'.