T o d d P a t t i s t wrote:
Rich Ahrens wrote:

But evidently not to yourself, as you continue your off-topic
metadiscussion here.

It's not off-topic. Discussion of the group and its rules
is on-topic. Gore/politics are OT.

Says you. There are groups where such metadiscussion is specifically
off-topic by charter or moderation requires a META: in the subject line
of such discussion. Show me where in the charter of RAH it says that
playing netkopp is on topic.

You didn't even have the courtesy to revise the
subject to reflect your hijack of the thread to netkopping.

The subject line states "Off topic" and I'm discussing that
part of the subject line.

So what? It also says "read", so by your argument I could lead this off
into the weeds on a discussion of literacy and the subject line would
still be accurate. Nonsense. The subject line is clear to any reasonable
reader as focusing on Gore and the internet. You've hijacked it into a
netkopping thicket.