On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:22:51 -0700, "RST Engineering"
wrote:


"tedstriker" wrote in message
.. .


But I
know some airports use it also.

Really? Where?

Jim


My home airport right here in Rock Hill, SC uses 122.7. KUZA


For plane to plane? I think not. You use 122.7 for Unicom, as it was
intended.

As to the FAA/FCC banning handhelds, wouldn't ya think before they did that
that they would pick one channel out of the 760 menagerie and declare it
"open season" for anything remotely RESEMBLING aviaition, including how to
find one another at fly-ins. Sheesh. One channel out of 760?

So we pick the least obnoxious of the lot and use it at Oshkosh. You got a
problem with that?

Jim


I was wrong about the plane to plane thing, I'm glad to find out it's
22.75.
I like the idea of picking a freq. to use for anything aviation. That
would be great! Now if we could get the FCC to go along with the
idea.....
NO problem with that at all. It's a great idea. The question is, why
is the FCC so tight with letting loose one of those 760 channels?
And what would it take to get things moving in the direction of
letting one freq. out of all those loose for that purpose