I didn't say it was a smart move (:-).

Bob

"David Megginson" wrote in message
...
"Bob Gardner" writes:

When I was an examiner, I would have expected you to fly the approach
profile as published. Once upon a time I decided to forego the "descent
and
maintain 2200 feet" on the way in to BFI's ILS 13R, thinking that I
would
stay at 3000 and intercept the glideslope high....got chided by Seattle
Approach for doing so.

But in that case, if I understand correctly, you had a specific
instruction from ATC to descend to 2200 -- that's different from
step-down altitudes in a published IAP.


All the best,


David