View Single Post
  #38  
Old July 20th 05, 10:07 PM
Happy Dog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Michael" wrote in

Yes, I neglected to point that out. But, the majority of samples
shouldn't
have been affected by this. Not to a level of .04% anyway.


Actually, that's not true. The NTSB believes that the majority of
cases where toxicology found alcohol in the system are indeed due to
this. The true magnitude of the drinking-and-flying accident rate is
acknowledged by the NTSB to be tiny.


Got a source for that? I'm surprised that the samples would have so often
deteriorated to that point. I'll do a bit of research and post what I find.

Thanks for the info.

moo