Rich S. wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
You're still assuming he's leading the ME-109 as if the gunner
were in a fixed location. He's assuming the gunner is actually
trying to hit the plane, and smart enough to figure out how
so that he times his shot *correctly*. You're both assuming
he fires straight back. He can hit the Me-109 by firing straight
back, but ONLY if he fires exactly as B-17 crosses the flight
path of the Me-109, and only if the Me-109 is fast enough or
close enough to get there before the bullet drops out of the
flight path of the Me-109. If the Me-109 is at a range of 50
yards, and no slower than the bullet the bullet will be no
more than 7 inches lower than the muzzle of the gun and will
still hit the Me-109 assuming the two planes are at the same
altitude.
Fred...............
I'll say it again - you misunderstand the question. I have stated it as
clearly as I am able and even drawn a diagram. I don't know how else to
explain it. I'm a pilot. I talk with my hands (hopefully without resorting
to certain gestures).
The B-17 is flying West. The ME-109 is flying South. They are both at the
same altitude. There is no wind. The ME-109 will cross the flight path of
the B-17 and the B-17 will, at that moment, be fifty yards from the ME-109.
The tail gunner fires his weapon straight behind the B-17.
There is no way that he can hit the ME-109, given the stated speed of the
B-17 and the muzzle velocity of the bullet.
The ME-109 will *always* be fifty yards or more away from the bullet.
Always.
Rich S.
The way I see it, you are both in agreement. Fred says to hit the 109
he has to fire at the exact time the 17 croses the 109's path. That is
correct. In effect he says that to fire as per your example he can't
hit it.
Harry K
|