George Patterson wrote in
news:8Pxdf.1813$Pa4.128@trndny01:

Andrew Gideon wrote:

Sure, but it would also help generate more early diagnoses of various
cancers and such.

And cause them in frequent flyers. At least, frequent use of the scans
with which I'm familiar (X-rays & such) are not a good idea.

I wonder what the reaction would be at security if you told them
you can't be x-rayed because you've already exceeded your maximum
annual dosage of radiation per gov't standards?

I vote for: "huh?"

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
Supernews sucks - blocking google, usenet.com & newsfeeds.com posts