On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:07:35 -0600, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in
::

It will somewhat bothersome but I just don't think it is something that the
AOPA should spend its political capital on. This will not effect 99.99999%
of the pilots in the country and those that it does are only going to have
to delay there climb to altitude by a matter of minutes.

And what of the precedent, flying UAVs incapable of complying with
see-and-avoid regulations, sets for future UAV operations in domestic
airspace below 18,000'? How would you feel if the DHS decided it
needed to employ UAVs for domestic spying throughout the country, and
it resulted in a proliferation of TRFs?