"anon" wrote in message
news:lGXBf.513772$084.422173@attbi_s22...
Juan Jimenez wrote:
Like I said, I believe you should
have the gumption to talk to Jim and get his side of the story. Until you
do that, all you're doing is blowing more hot air of the RAH gaggle type.


Juan, it is interesting that you suggest talking to Jim. I have had the
pleasure, so I have passed your hot air test.

I spoke to Jim, when he called me on my cell phone early one Sunday
morning. I ended up getting his side of a number of his "stories" in the
course of this 60+ minute conversation.

During this phone call, I was lectured and threatened and was party to
both sides of the good cop bad cop routine.

After I advised a British aviation magazine to check out Jim's credentials
a little more carefully before accepting his contributions, that same
magazine provided Jim with my email message and cell phone number. This
says something about that magazine's integrity.

It could just as well say much more about the accuracy of your story, and
the fact that you won't name which magazine broke your confidence says even
more. Are you worried they're going to take exception to your side of the
story? If so, why?

I do believe I will mercy snip at this point. There's too many BS artists
plying trades around here these days.

Juan