View Single Post
  #13  
Old February 23rd 06, 06:18 PM posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 200+ 9/11 'Smoking Guns' Found in the Mainstream Media

"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote in news:24lLf.23578$Ug4.8465@dukeread12:

TRUTH wrote:
Dan wrote in news:ASjLf.23568$Ug4.8809@dukeread12:

TRUTH wrote:
Dan wrote in news:eThLf.22983$Ug4.6352@dukeread12:

TRUTH wrote:
Peter Twydell wrote in news:+1usDfBfrW
:

In message , TRUTH
writes
For those who don't trust "alternate" websites



http://killtown.911review.org/911smokingguns.html
Terry Pratchett wrote "The truth will make you fret". Too bloody
right.

Why do you persist in posting this crap? Especially to
newsgroups where your chance of encountering anybody who might
even think
about
any of
it
being true is about as likely as the Beatles getting back
together? (Apart from the known nutters, of course)

Try alt.imagullibledickhead.xx instead.

Heah asswipe, I'd advise you to look at the evidence before
posting such childish nonsense. The WTC was taken down by
controlled demolitions. THAT'S where the evidence points. And
since there's no evidence otherwise, you loose.

So take your kooky opinions to alt.imagullibledickhead.xx. You
understand that, moron?
Before you get too excited you should read the cite you
provided. It
contains a few errors the most glaring of which is the statement
#
30
9/11 - FAA bans takeoffs at 9:26 am for all civilian, military,
or law enforcement aircraft (FAA, Time)
FAA didn't then, and does not now, have authority over military
flight operations.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired



So what you're saying is that a website that gives links to
mainstream media must be 100% accurate, otherwise it's not
trustworthy? How about applying that type of thinking to the
government's version of 9/11!
I said nothing of the kind, did I? I pointed out an error in a
cite
YOU provided. The same cite that implies a link between 9/11 and a
television show and a never implemented operation from 1962.

You were busy spewing your filth at someone who said what most of
us
are thinking, but are too polite to say.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired




What the hell's wrong with you? How about looking at the mainstream
media articles and stop nitpicking? btw, your version of events is
filth with no proof


I call this filth: "Heah asswipe, I'd advise you to look at the
evidence before posting such childish nonsense."

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired




That response from me was directed to the asswipe who insulted me. An eye
for an eye


Why don't you provide some evidence to support your, eh, claims then?

Paul Nixon