Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11
An average troll by the lame handle of "TRUTH" wrote:
"-hh" wrote:
TRUTH wrote:
Show me one piece of evidence where a demolition expert, or structural
engineer, demonstrates Jones' to be false
Jones claims that the presence of black smoke means the fire
temperatures could not have exceeded 650 C.
That is correct. btw, what is your expertise and education, may I ask.
You first.
...
That is pure nonsense! One cannot say, "For the Towers to have collapsed
from fire, the fire must have been hotter somewhere. Therefore the fire
WAS hottter somewhere."
That's not what I said.
Where is the proof of that hotter fire?
You have asked the wrong question. The correct question is:
Where is the proof that there *could* *not* *have* *been* a hotter
fire?
The problem is that some black smoke is merely proof of *a* low order
fire; it does not positively preclude the presence of a higher order
fire.
There is no evidence showing hotter fires in other areas.
There's the evidence of tons of melted & salmon/yellow hot iron. That
says that there was a huge amount of heat that was present that
requires a source.
Jones tries to explain this away with his thermite claim. The problem
with this is that it is pragmatically inadequate to accomplish it on
the scale required: at the lower limit, you would have needed to have
smuggled at least 2,500 cubic feet of thermite *per floor* of the
building, and the upper limit is ~10,000 cubic feet *per floor*. The
scale is simply out of bounds to be considered practicable as a covert
preparation...let alone at low risk.
One cannot simply assume that there was.
Actually, as per the principles of Occam's Razor, we are obligated to
make just that assumption. It is not until the most simple assumption
has been clearly disproven do you from a causal approach "fall back" to
a more complicated solution set.
...you're treating it lile it's all there is. How about explaining the rest of that paper?
I don't need to, because you only asked for (and I quote): "one piece
of evidence". Your request has been satified.
-hh
|