Jim Logajan wrote in
:

TRUTH wrote:
Jim Logajan wrote: in
You may be able to test Jones' speculations in the comfort of your
own home. No need for any math or computer simulations. You'll need
a set of Dominos or other long skinny rectangular blocks. Construct
a mini WTC or WTC-7 along these lines:

[ Experimental details elided for brevity. ]

Let me know how the experiment goes.

And where are the experiments pointing out the government's version?

At present we are trying to determine how model buildings collapse.
Jones claims the building should have fallen "over", not mostly down -
the version accepted by many others (including presumably the
government) allegedly say it would tend to fall mostly down, not
"over." This is a prime example where objective physical experiments
can help determine the TRUTH. If you seek truth you should be looking
forward to performing the experiment - it is easy enough to do. If,
however, you have an agenda then, well, you will find some "out".

Let me know how the experiment goes.




I don't have the expertise to do such an experiment. Common sense is what
makes it obvious.

What did Rumsleld say the flight 93 was shot down? why did he say the
Pentagon was hit by a missile?

Respond in the other thread. I will no longer monitor this one