Chad Irby wrote in news:cirby-CB1EB0.09471124022006
@news-server2.tampabay.rr.com:

In article ,
"Toni Virta" wrote:

I'm, a conspiracy buff, I always want to hear different scenarios
and not just jump into the easiest or official solution. Still I've
always thought, that these 9/11 theories are extremely hard to
believe, when you consider the magnitude of the job. And even if it
was doable, the events and the reasons behind them in these actions
do not seem logical. Especially like the collapse of WTC-7. If it
was indeed a government job, why demolish that building too?

The thing the nuts keep skipping over is that since WTC-7 has so
heavily
damaged from fire and debris, they were already talking about having to
go in and tear it down *before* it fell in on itself.




From Jones' paper:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html


There were twenty-four huge steel support columns inside WTC 7 as well as
huge trusses, arranged non-symmetrically, along with some fifty-seven
perimeter columns, as indicated in the diagram below (FEMA, 2002, chapter
5; NIST, 2005).


[See This Diagram]

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.h1.jpg



Diagram showing steel-column arrangement in WTC 7, view looking down on
the roof. Circled columns were possibly damaged due to debris from WTC 1
collapse, some 350 feet away (NIST, 2005) so the damage was clearly non-
symmetrical, and evidently, none of the core columns was severed by
falling debris. WTC 7 was never hit by a plane