Orval Fairbairn wrote in
news
In article ,
TRUTH wrote:
Pooh Bear wrote in
:
TRUTH wrote:
Pooh Bear wrote in
:
TRUTH wrote:
"Matt Wright" wrote in
oups.com:
Another poster provided FAA records showing that Mohammed
Atta was both commercial and instrument rated - hardly a
"clueless non-pilot". Flight instructors maybe had poor
overall opinions of the pilots, but you don't know how long
they trained away from the flight school. You don't know how
much "book time" they had studying avionics. The attack had
years of planning behind it. I guess they could have spent
that time playing pinball... but maybe instead they were
studying. That something is hard does not make it impossible.
Matt.
I missed that. Please post it. Still, showing one of them was
instrument trained does not explain the others
How many times do you need to have it explained to you that
there was no need for any of them to be instrument trained ?
Flying in clear skies does not require an instrument rating.
Graham
At 30,000 feet it does
INCORRECT !
FAA regulations require the licensed crew to use instrument flying
techniques ( for obvious reasons ).
That doesn't mean that it's impossible to fly VFR ( visual flight
rules ) - it just means you're breaking the law. Do you think the
hijackers even cared about that ?
If you can see the horizon / ground ( at any height ) you don't
need to fly instruments ( other than to obey regulations ).
Graham
Okay, I'll admit you "might" know about this stuff, although I would
give an Aeronautical Engineer's opinion a little more weight. I am
not an expert in every aspect of 9/11. And I admit it. Stange how
others do not do the same
Look, dimbulb: THIS aeronautical engineer (with 40 years experience in
field, BTW) and pilot (of 45 year experience) says that your source
doesn't know what he is talking about; furthermore, it is irrelevant
whether or not he is an "aeronautical engineer".
I have worked with a whole spectrum of aero engineers -- their
aeronautical knowledge has ranged from superior to abysmal -- your guy
falls into the latter category.
Your posting and the answers you have received fall into the category
of, "If you aren't going to like the answer, don't ask the question."
You have asked the question in an aviation newsgroup and gotten a
unanimous answer: you are full of ****!
Well......it's obvious from the way you present yourself, that you are an
over emotional hot-head. Therefore you obviously cannot be trusted to
look at information objectively and clearly.
BTW.... You think bin Laden admitted to 9/11?
Here's five Osamas:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/binladen8.jpg
Osama "E" admitted to 9/11 on videotape. Even Mr Magoo can tell that is
not bin Ladin.
The video is archived on National Public Radio's website here
http://www.npr.org/news/specials/res...213.binladen.t
ape.html
In that video, he writes with his right hand, when the FBI's website says
he's left handed.
He wears a gold ring, which is forbidden in Islam.
More info here
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.html