The Whole Truth wrote in
:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:52:41 GMT, TRUTH wrote:
Okay. WTC 7 was the only WTC building not in the same physical area as
the other WTC buidlings.
WTC-7 was located 355 feet from the North Tower.
Okay
The leaseholder of WTC 7 had been in posession
of the lease since the building was built in 1987. Six weeks before
9/11 he bought a lease on the entire WTC complex. I don't know the
legality, but this site may help explain:
http://www.insurancejournal.com/news...6/07/15925.htm
Your point? You know even know if it's relevant but you throw it
out anyway.
WTC 7 needed to be destoyed for legal reasons.
Also, WTC 7 housed numerous government agencies. Paper documents, such
as those from ENRON, were destroyed when the building was "pulled".
Only a moron would blow up an office building they own to destroy
their own
documents instead of simply shredding them. Only a complete idiot
would claim that an agency capable of secretly blowing up a national
landmark and killing 3,000 people are morons.
You are right. And that's why there was much more involved than that.
WTC 7 was a steel framed building and housed the mayor's 13 million
dollar command bunker. It is theorized that this bunker was used to
control the Towers' demolitions (it was dust proof), and therefore
needed to be destroyed for any evidence it may have.
So not only was it the federal government, the city of New York was
involved?
We're talking hundreds of people, if not thousands; to do something
that would have been just as easily accomplished from inside a
portable trailer with a 10 man crew.
Not nessarily the "federal government", or "the city of New York" as a
unit, but individual people from within. I can assure you, the entire NYC
Police Dept and the entire NYC Fire Dept knows that 9/11 was an inside
job. But they are forbidden to discuss it, as per gag orders. The major
has publically stated that he was warned that the South Tower was going
to collapse. This notification came from the OEM. Why did they tell him
and not the firefighters in the buildings? The City of NY tried
desperately to keep the WTC Task Force Interview transcripts private. But
the NY Times sued the City and won (after a year long court battle). The
Times published them, and it is clear that FDNY personnel saw flashes and
heard explosions that they compared to controlled demoltions. See this
page for a collaboration:
http://forums.bluelemur.com/viewtopic.php?t=4820
Also, the WTC 7 collapse begs the question: would the city construct
the mayor's 13 million dollar command bunker in a building that could
completely collapse from random damage and fires?
There is no such thing as an indestructable building, where should
they have
located it, inside Norad's Chyenne Mountain complex?
Not many people know about WTC 7 because of media silence. Even when
Professor Jones was on MSNBC, the station refused to play the WTC7
video clip he sent them! info on this at www.st911.org
You still haven't offered one shred of evidence as to how the
government knew
in advance that a building not in the same physical area as the
impacts would be hit by large pieces of debris and set on fire for
half a day with the fire unable to be controlled by the NYFD due to 20
inch water main ruptured by falling debris.
It was pure luck that WTC 7 got hit by debris. And the only reason those
fires spread in the first place, was because the WTC fire alarm was put
in "test mode" at 6:47 AM on 9/11, effectively disabling it. This
information was furnished by the official NIST report