
February 27th 06, 03:16 AM
posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
|
|
|
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11
"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
"khobar" wrote in
news:nxpMf.4760$Sp2.702@fed1read02:
"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
"khobar" wrote in news:6L_Lf.4564$Sp2.2013
@fed1read02:
"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
Untrue, and I can demonstrate that he
Chad Irby wrote in
news:cirby-6A2D32.09511624022006 @news-server2.tampabay.rr.com:
In article ,
TRUTH wrote:
You believe a 757 hit the Pentagon when there's no evidence,
...aside from the *hundreds* of eyewitnesses (it flew over a
crowded freeway on the way in),
First of all, many people reported seeing a plane that looked
nothing like a 757. (They reported a much smaller plane.)
Second, if one could say that the FDNY personnel acounts of
flashes, explosions, bombs at the WTC (that they compared to
conrolled demoltions!) are unreliable, then the same could be said
for any eyewitnesses who think they saw a 757 fly near the
Pentagon. Fire department personnel may not be experts in
controlled demolitions, but they sure as hell know more about it
than the "average joe" knows
about
airplanes.
Third, where exactly did you hear that *hundreds* of eyewitnesses
reported a 757 at the Pentagon? Do you have a URL for this?
the light poles knocked over by the plane on
approach,
easily accomlished by a small drone
the missing commercial flight (it was a regularly scheduled
flight, and never landed anywhere else),
Could have landed at a military base. Or, may God help them, shot
down over the Atlantic
the actual physical debris
(yes, it was there, and yes, it was in the colors used by that
airline),
If you're referring to this
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/images/debris.jpg
It was easily dropped by someone involved.
Also, remember the government claims that they identified *all*
the passengers from their DNA. The plane (make of metal)
practically incinerates, but organic matter (inside the metal
plane) survived?
and the damage done to the building by something the size of a
commercial aircraft flying into it at a few hundred miles per
hour...
That is completely untrue. Look at the pictures and see for
yourself
You provided proof that a 757 hit the Pentagon yourself, and
acknowledged
such.
Paul Nixon
You must be twisting my words. I never said such a thing
Actually you did, when I pointed out that you posted a link to proof
that a 757 did hit the Pentagon. In summary, your response was
something to the effect of "opps, I'm not perfect!".
Paul Nixon
That wasn't in response to finding evidence of a 757 at the pentagon,
What was it in response to then, eh?
Paul Nixon
|