An average troll by the lame handle of "TRUTH" wrote:
"-hh" wrote
An average troll by the lame handle of "TRUTH" wrote:

...btw, what is your expertise and education, may I ask.

You first.

Just a placeholder :-)

...you're treating it lile it's all there is. How about explaining
the rest of that paper?

I don't need to, because you only asked for (and I quote): "one piece
of evidence". Your request has been satified.

You're a government shill.

You've resorted to namecalling; how nice. According to Bell's Law,
this means that you've run out of substantiative things to say, which
means you've admitted that you've lost the arguement.

The laws of physics and logic of causality don't care who points out
the facts, because that cannot change the facts. Logically, "a chain
is only as strong as its weakest link", so it only takes one disproven
fact to debunk Jone's claims...and from what I provided, I illustrated
that Jone's chain was broken at least twice, which makes it quite
compelling that he's completely and utterly wrong.

You're free to believe that Jones can ignore the laws of physics and
logical causality if you wish, but you'll be completely, utterly and
forever wrong.


-hh