Dan wrote in news:rZzRf.61236$Ug4.16589@dukeread12:

Wake Up! wrote:
mrtravel wrote in news:ZBvRf.521$4L1.486
@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com:

Wake Up! wrote:
Whatever, though, for you to simply assume that WTC 7, a steel
framed building, totally collapsed near free fall speed from fire,
you are definitely not qualified. A qualified engineer would know
that steel framed buildings do not completely collapse from fire.
Never. Sorry.
You claim it was thermite.
There is also ample evidence on collapses of steel structures.
But, don't let the facts bother you.
You seem to be ignoring any information provided to you, even the
info you post yourself.




No 1: It was thermite or some other kind of cutter-explosives. It's
the ones who believe the government's nonsense that say it was fire.

Other than Jones provide cites proving thermite is a
"cutter-explosive." You have been told many times by those of us who
have used it that it is not used for cutting nor is it an explosive.

No 2: your comment about "ample evidence on collapses of steel
structures" has absolutely zero relevance on what I'm talking about.



Steel Framed Skyscrapers Do NOT Completely Collapse From Fire Period!

What is so hard for people to understand about that statement?

It never happened before! NEVER!!! IT IS A FACT!!!

Then again no one had ever flown large civilian jetliners into 100
story buildings either. Why do you ignore experts in the relevant
fields and insist on listening to Jones who is not?


According to you pilots it could happen on 9/11 THREE times? My God!


WTC 7 was ***NOT*** hit by an airplane! Is that understood?

No one said it was, but it was struck by debris from WTC1 and WTC2 and
burned for a long time due to fuels inside the building.

WTC 7 collapsed near symetrically, near free fall speed!

Then explain how it leaned over as it fell. Look at the pile of
rubble.

WTC 7 had smoke puffs going up the wall just as it started to
collapse!

Yes, that's what happens when smoke from an ongoing fire is
released
due to collapse. It happens in residential fires too.


The WTC 7 leaseholder said (on camera) that it was pulled! The
leaseholder bought a 99 yr lease on the entire WTC complex just six
weeks before 9/11! He wasn't in his North Tower office on 9/11 due to
a "doctors appointment"! His lawyers successfully sued to get TWICE
the payout claiming it was two separate attacks! The insurance
company's structural engineer said (on camera) that the way the
vertical columns in the Towers severed simultaneously was just like
controlled demolitions! The WTC 7 fire alarm was put into test mode
the morning of 9/11!

So what? Nothing there proves a conspiracy. Suppose your a Cessna
172
drops out of the sky and lands on your house while you are at a
doctor's appointment. Does that make you responsible for the
destruction?


Each Twin Tower was designed withstand the impact on a FULLY LOADED
707! The 767s on 9/11 were UNDERBOOKED! An executive in the WTC
Construction Management Company said (on camera) in his opinion the
Towers could withstand MULTIPLE 707 crashes! He said a plane crashing
into the Towers is the same as a pencil puncturing a window screen --
it does NOTHING!


767 is much bigger than 707 and is more massive even when
"underbooked." The towers were designed to withstand a single 707.
Even if they could were designed to take multiple 707 hits and survive
those strikes would have been spread out over a larger area then a
single 767 strike. Please try thinking logically.



It is time to Wake UP! and face the TRUTH

Take your own advice.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired




I think you should go back to dropping bombs and leave the thinking to
those who know how to. For you to simply dismiss the WTC 7 collapse the
way you do shows you are not thinking rationally. And for you to dismiss
the other info as a non-conspiracy and automatically assume it's all pure
coincidence, shows you cannot take things into context. Sorry. But I'll
bet you're a great pilot!