True, but Cincy approach may not let you into their class B airpspace
without their radar working.

Shila could have been the IAF, no reason FLM needs to be it.

The Jepp charts for all LUK approaches show no difference in the line
thicknesses so I guess everyone charted it wrong.

Sandy

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

"Sandy Mustard" wrote in message
...

No IAF is designated.

No matter where you are coming from, Cincy approach will vector you to
the SHILA FAC fix.

You will always get RADAR vectors, as you will be in Cincy's Class B
airspace to perform this approach.



Cincy approach isn't going to vector you if they are without radar, but this
approach can be flown without it. Falmouth VOR/DME should have been
designated as an IAF. Note that the FLM 338R has the heavy line of a
procedure track, not the lighter line of a feeder route. Chart error. You
can fly this approach via FLM if you've got DME and ADF, or appropriate GPS.