Still don't get it? You are so good at being argumentative and putting
words in my mouth. Did I say these areas are restricted? Did I imply
that no one else can visit these places? I have never tried to restrict
access to any of these places, how could I? Many of them are on maps
obtainable from the BLM, National Forest Service and National Park
Service. This is public land, open to anyone with the eyes to see it.
And no, none of the places I'm thinking of are on Indian lands. All
PUBLIC lands. I have the right to visit them, as does anyone else. It is
just that most don't choose to do so.

Peter Duniho wrote:


But what right do you have to visit those places without interference from
anyone else? You certainly have a right to seek a place that isn't visited
by other humans, that is untainted by the noise of their activities. But
the onus is on you to find such a place. It is unfair to restrict access of
your favorites sites by others, just because you don't want to share them.

Pete