"RomeoMike" wrote in message
...
Still don't get it? You are so good at being argumentative and putting
words in my mouth. Did I say these areas are restricted?

They ARE restricted. People flying airplanes aren't permitted there.
Whether you said it is immaterial.

Did I imply that no one else can visit these places? I have never tried to
restrict access to any of these places, how could I?

The same way that people (apparently other than you, judging from your
reply) have already restricted access to those places.

Many of them are on maps obtainable from the BLM, National Forest Service
and National Park Service. This is public land, open to anyone with the
eyes to see it.

Sorry, I thought you were arguing *against* aircraft accessing the land.
Your statement above argues *for* access by aircraft.

Or are you saying that only the people of whom you approve should be granted
full access? That is, people in airplanes don't count. Only people who
hike in are deserving of free access?

Pete