It's not the flying that is the activity in question. It's the viewing of
the Grand Canyon.

No, it is the (powered) flying. Viewing the Grand Canyon from the air
(in a powered airplane) is what affects other people. It's the noise.

I doubt that there would be objections to gliders flying down the canyon
(though there may be objections to the support infrastructure).

I even said so in my post, but you decided to trim that
part from your quote

I disagree that it is the flying.

(I suppose to make your own post seem like it was a relevant reply)

It's a conversation, not a conspiracy. Here's your full post:

Peter Duniho:
"Jose" wrote in message
t...

If blorging interferes with gluping, and gluping interferes with blorging,
which one should be restricted? Why?


Blorging should be, because you can blorg anywhere, but you can only glup at
the particular site.

Peace and quiet is not unique to the Grand Canyon. The view is. Enjoyment
of the view should take priority over enjoyment of peace and quiet.

As I've already said numerous times, I'm not against moderate regulation.
But banning any user goes too far.

Pete

....and here's mine...

Blorging should be, because you can blorg anywhere, but you can only glup at the particular site.


I never said where blorging or glupping was possible. However I'll go with that for now.

One can fly anywhere. One can only commune with the grand canyon in silence at the grand canyon. So, flying should be restricted, by your comment above.

Jose

Neither Blorging nor Glupping were defined, yet you chose one. Using
that logic, that one should be chosen no matter what the defintions of
blorging and glupping are, so long as they fit your logic. The
definitions I chose fit your logic (though not your vision).

Jose
--
The price of freedom is... well... freedom.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.