"Steve Pierce" wrote in message
news:bdb60699c2718201cc6d7163d271f4a2@aviatorlive. com...
"Of course it was, predominantly. As the pilot, you just have to pay
attention. Its that simple. I'm sure the Fed and the event insuror settled

because it was cheaper and lower risk than going to trial, where a weeping

widow giving testimony would make short shrift of objective legal
analysis."

The RV6A pilot didn't follow the FAA published arrival NOTAM and wasn't on
CTAF. Never seen a PA16 that could overtake an RV either. Funny how the
eye whitnesses that were in the airplane behind the two accident aircraft
had a different account than the controllers. Infact the controllers
account changed from the day of the accident 180 degrees 10 days later.

What is this post in reference to?