"Peter R." wrote in message
...
karl gruber wrote:

. I doubt that your Bonanza is somehow set up that
your CHTs would be 60-80 degrees below many other Bonanzas or John's,
especially since he is so fastidious about his installation.

Woah, now I am really listening. Drop names like that and I am all
ears.

Name dropping, or refering to a fellow whose numbers are much higher than
yours (on the record) and whose setup and installation were done by the same
company.


This is the type of **** that scares me about aircraft ownership. Here I
am, fat, dumb, and happy thinking with a data point of one that hot CHTs
are not an issue with my aircraft and then something like this comes out
of
my blind side to smack me in the face.

WTF?


I transitioned to this aircraft from a Cessna 172 that had nothing except
poor analog FF and EGT gauges. Thus, when I was introduced to the world
of engine monitors, I relied on the experience of the previous owner of
this aircraft, who, as a 1,500 hour Bonanza pilot, also sang the praises
of
how cool the CHTs ran during cruise.

Man, if my JPI probes are off by 60-80 degrees, I am going to have some
serious questions of TA Turbo, JPI, and my mechanic.

That's what a bunch here have been telling you. As well, is the problem
TATurbo (they did your's, Deakin's, mine, hundreds of others, but your's is
the anomaly.

I suspect you've been to the APS seminar, and you didn't notice something
wrong in your numbers? Then, too, it's not unheard of that an installation
(probes, analyzer, etc) would fail shortly after being placed in service.

I'm not sure, but it seems you're having a bad reaction to the news that
something isn't kosher with your airplane.


--
Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO (MTJ)