We've been at war with NK for 56 years, have troops
stationed there, I'm sure we have every target located.



"Richard Riley" wrote in message
...
| On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 02:07:20 -0500, "Jim Macklin"
| wrote:
|
| WE don't need nukes, we have JDAM
|
| Not sure if we have the targeting infor for effective JDAM
use.
|
| In a perfect world (which I don't think we're in) we and
China would
| have quietly come to a meeting of the minds. China would
continue to
| be an impediment to sanctions to retain Kim's trust. The
next time
| Kim takes his special train into China for medical
treatment he's
| taken prisoner. China rolls in slowly from the north
while
| broadcasting Kim's order to surrender. The South
evacuates Soul but
| doesn't invade. The US offers a buy out to the rest of
the eliets
| (the ones currently buying homes in China) - money and
safety for
| leaving.
|
| But it all depends on China. I don't think they're
willing to give up
| their surrogate, they like having Kim around to poke the
US every
| couple of years.
|
| Popular Mechanics has a terrific article (they've been
doing that a
| lot, lately) about how much farther along the DPRK is on
bio and chem
| weapons than they are on nukes.