In a previous article, "Steven P. McNicoll" said:
wrote in message
Because the original post described a situation which required an
instrument letdown, namely landing under IFR.
He's got it backward. It was I that addressed an instrument letdown being
necessary and Paul that addressed a visual letdown.

No, I was *asking* a question, not stating something was possible. You
see, I didn't know if when you can see the runway and everything between
you and it, you can use a contact approach and/or cancel and land VFR
regardless of whether the tower is reporting IFR visibilities. But while
I got an answer about the contact approach thing, I never got an answer
about cancelling. Instead of an answer, all I get is people quoting rules
without explaining how they are relevant to the question. Which is par
for the course around here, it seems.

--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
Just another organic pain collector racing to oblivion