Peter Duniho wrote:
I'm positive he's referring to me.

You would be correct, sir

He's got quite a grudge apparently, and based on mostly false recollection I'm sure.

No, no grudge at all. And your assumptions of false recollection are a
bit knee-jerk here IMO, but amusing in their smugness

For example, the accusation he makes here about something I supposedly wrote about him is completely false. I suppose I ought to be flattered that he finds it so compelling to obsess over my supposed wrongs, but really I think he ought to just get over it.

What accusation Pete? Anything you "supposedly" wrote is in the Google
archives if I cared to dig it up (I don't) Don't flatter yourself here,
I'm not obsessing - it was more of a stream-of-consciousness thing
triggered by Bela's post

Whatever "it" is, it can't possibly be worth the time he apparently spends thinking about it, even if it were true.

See above.