On Feb 7, 4:56 am, Mxsmanic wrote:
In other words, you disagree with him. That doesn't mean that he lacks the
credentials he claims, nor does it make him unqualified.

Actually, he disagreed with someone else and claimed THEY were not
qualified.If someone disagrees with me that doesnt make them
unqualified, it makes them smart.

To be a pilot, instructor, etc., you need only pass certain tests. You don't
have to be an expert in aviation. Credentials do not equal qualifications,
and vice versa.
Actually, instructors are in fact sky gods.They are all knowing and
all telling pillars of the aviation community.They are men among men
(even the females).All kidding aside, you would expect a person to
have a certain level of knowlege for a certain level of ratings.


"Trolling" is so overused that it really doesn't mean anything any more.
Nobody is trolling on this list that I can see. Disagreeing with your point
of view is not trolling.

Good point.And this is exactly MY point.If AS disagrees with someone,
he could stand to be a bit civil.Also, the guy shouldnt debate topics
he does not have a grasp of.Kind of like what you did a few threads
ago.

No doubt because it is so incongruent with the obvious reality.

Incongruent?I dont know what that means.Dont use big words with me.

Or is he just expressing an opinion that you don't like?

Or in this case he is calling other peoples credentals into
question.Thats an opinion I could do without.
--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.