View Single Post
  #13  
Old July 10th 03, 03:46 PM
phil hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 10 Jul 2003 05:26:44 -0700, Tom Cooper wrote:

I pointed at the fact that many here - and obviously this includes you
too - think that "striking Bushehr = ending eventual Iranian projects
on the topic of nuclear weapons"


But doesn't Iran need Bushehr to produce plutonium? Without it, they
lose the cabability fro a hime-produced bomb, don't they? (Although
I suppose they might be able to buy fissile material from another
country.)


--
Phil
"If only sarcasm could overturn bureaucracies"
-- NTK, commenting on www.cabalamat.org/weblog/art_29.html