View Single Post
  #7  
Old September 9th 03, 07:43 AM
Barnyard BOb --
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Eric Miller wrote:

Nod, I recently became aware that a tailwheel endorsement wasn't required to
fly a tailwheel experimental.


Tailwheel and/or high perf endorsements may not be required
by part 61, but it may (emphasize MAY) be required by your
operating limitations.

Dave 'read and heed' Hyde

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Quite true.
But, I've always wondered why Part 61 is not required
to stand on its own and be the final governing authority.

Kinda sux that a single high minded DAR can usurp the
authority and intent of a huge deliberate bureaucracy.

One should be free to kill oneself.
Is this not the American way? g


Barnyard BOb --