Larry Dighera wrote:
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 19:41:46 GMT, Matt Whiting
wrote in :

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 12:05:17 -0500, 601XL Builder
wrDOTgiacona@suddenlinkDOTnet wrote in
:

But to do so we are screwing which nature which the environmentalists
have been saying is BAD for the last 50 years or so.
Oh, you mean like banning fluorocarbon aerosol propellants to diminish
the destruction of the ozone layer? :-(

Then there is the whole issue that the warming trend isn't even limited
to Earth and that Mars is experiencing global warming as well.
That's a diversionary argument that skirts the issue of the effect of
global warming on the potential extinction of species, flooding of
coastal land, and ocean current disruption.

Yes, any facts that counter the global warming nuts are considered
diversionary. I also like how they explain EVERYTHING via the global
warming argument. Have a warmer day that normal ... global warming!
Have a colder day than normal ... global warming! McDonalds burn your
Big Mac ... global warming! Ok, I made up the last one, but the GW nuts
are almost at that level now.

Matt

It's apparent that you haven't viewed former Vice President Gore's
motion picture yet.

Inform yourself before you make absurd assertions.

Gore's film doesn't contain information, so watching the complete film
is a waste of time. I did attend a lecture recently by Ira Magaziner
who is chair of the Clinton Climate Initiative. After 1.5 hours of
lecture, I remain absolutely convinced that global warming is just a
another scam to line the pockets of Clinton, Gore and their cronies.

Matt