From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 9/10/2003 7:20 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

snip

You are an wrong again, Dan and we can only assume you are either lying, or
senile.

For cold weather:

low t0, more fuel == higher mass flow rate - more thrust

for water injection:

low TIT, more fuel ==higher mass flow rate-more thrust

I tend to believe you are either a fraud, or a troll, at this point, Dan.
Are you a sock, Dan, operated by our village idiot, Knoyle? I mean, this as
a serious question, because at this point, there is no possibility you ever
worked a pitot tube on a jet.

Tarver, last time I saw C-141s, F-4Es, T-33s,T-39s and KC-135s were jets.

Oh, silly me, the ones on the F-4E and T-39s are pitot-static tubes.

Now, if you want to count UH-1Ps, HH-3s, HH-53s, UH-60 and C-130s as jet
aircraft, turbine driven, (non gasoline), none of them had "t0" derived from
pitot or pitot-static tubes.

Now, since you think personal attacks and abuse are appropriate behaviour for
adults I will no longer discuss this with you. Just do a google search and you
will see I am no one's puppet.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired