View Single Post
  #37  
Old September 11th 03, 07:22 AM
Jim Knoyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 9/10/2003 7:20 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

snip

You are an wrong again, Dan and we can only assume you are either

lying,
or
senile.

For cold weather:

low t0, more fuel == higher mass flow rate - more thrust

for water injection:

low TIT, more fuel ==higher mass flow rate-more thrust

I tend to believe you are either a fraud, or a troll, at this point,

Dan.
Are you a sock, Dan, operated by our village idiot, Knoyle? I mean,

this
as
a serious question, because at this point, there is no possibility you

ever
worked a pitot tube on a jet.

Tarver, last time I saw C-141s, F-4Es, T-33s,T-39s and KC-135s were

jets.

Sorry Dan, if there was no temperature probe, you weren't there. A jet
engine requires SAT. (ie T0) Stop making a fool of yourself and just bow
out.


Is that more like the T2 or the T12 on a CFM-56? (737)

Answer up Dan, a serious question, are you a Knoyle sock?.



Actually, there was a guy posting here over a year ago using
a different name than he signed on my retirement card ... but
I can almost guarantee you, he is noone's sock.
http://home.att.net/~j.knoyle/memorabilia.html