In message , phil hunt
writes
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 22:00:06 +0100, Paul J. Adam news@jrwlyn
ch.demon.co.uk wrote:
Too vague to be useful, then.

It's some use. 1/4 would mean detection range is decreased by 30%

At what frequency and over what extent? Is this a narrow little null, an
averaged plot, or actually a nasty nose flash?

You're just not going to get *useful* RCS data in the public domain.


--
When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite.
W S Churchill

Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk