View Single Post
  #46  
Old September 18th 03, 05:49 PM
phil hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 17 Sep 2003 21:07:15 -0700, robert arndt wrote:
(phil hunt) wrote in message ...
On 17 Sep 2003 08:41:16 -0700, robert arndt wrote:

Tehran should be a smoking ruin by now,
[...]
I only live for the day [when I can] watch as Tehran disappears in
a mushroom cloud.


When are you growing the toothbrush mustache, Bob?



Let me get this straight Phil, buddy. You compare me to Hitler because
I believe Tehran should be destroyed in the event of an attack against
the State of Israel with IRBMs


You believe it should be destroyed "by now". Now, perhaps I am
ignorant of current developments in the middle east, but to my
knowledge Iran hasn't launched IRBMs at Israel, so you believe it
deosn't be destoryed irrespective of this. The fact is, you are
someone who gloats at the imagined death of millions of people. The
only difference between you and Hitler is that he was powerful
enough to make his fantasies reality.

(which for all we know in the future
might mount an Iranian-made or DPRK/FSU purchased nuclear warhead)...


Indeed.

yet, you say nothing of Iran's blatant terrorist funding against
Israel,


Just like you say nothing of Israel's blatant oppression of millions
of Palestinians?

it's intense historical hatred of the Jews (including support
for the Nazi holocaust of WW2), and the fact that it is actively
seeking to develop nuclear weapons with the SOLE purpose of being
directed against Israel.


AFAICT, the main purpose is to deter American aggression. It's
highly unlikely a nuclear-armed Iran would use nuclear weapons
against Israel, for the same reason that no nuclear weapon state
has ever used nuclear weapons against another nuclear weapon state.
One thing the leaders of all countries have in common is they don't
want to become radioactive cinders.

Who's the fascist then?


I'm not quite sure what you are getting at -- you seem to be saying
that if the Iranian govmt are fascists, you can't be. Is that what
you are saying? If not, what are you saying?

It's quite obvious that there is no shortage of people with nasty beliefs
and attitudes on either side of the disputer between Israel and the Arab/
Muslim world; but it's equally obvious that this has no bearing on whether
you, personally, are a fascist.

The US should have dealt with Tehran during
the hostage crisis, and I'm not referring to "Operation Eagle Claw"
either.


What are you refering to, then?

Instead, we elected President Reagan and let Iraq fight a 8 yr
war with them. The US has tried repeatedly to win over the
pro-democracy elements in Iranian society


By deposing Mossadeq?

but has failed. Iran is
developing nuclear weapons for the purpose of destroying the Jewish
State.


I disagree, for reasons I've explained earlier.

I don't blame Israel at all for it's tough stance and threats
to pre-emptive attack/sabotage their efforts.


As I understand it, you are saying that the Israeli _Herrenvolk_ are
superior to the Arab and Muslim _Untermensch_, so have a natural right
to kill them, and displace them off their land to create _Lebensraum_.
That's what you seem to beleive -- tell me if I'm wrong, but your belief system is indistinguishable from Hitler's, if you just change a few
labels.

And if Tehran is someday
wiped off the earth as a consequence of their own
anti-semitism/arrogance then so be it. I won't lose any sleep over
it...


If I could be bothered to re-read _Mein Kampf_ I'm sure I could come
up with similar phrases.

Face it, you're a fascist.

--
A: top posting

Q: what's the most annoying thing about Usenet?