View Single Post
  #159  
Old September 21st 03, 06:12 PM
Alan Minyard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 22:30:53 +0100, "Paul J. Adam"
wrote:

In message , Alan Minyard
writes
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 19:02:28 +0100, "Paul J. Adam"
wrote:
Have you seen the plots, Al, or just LockMart propaganda? What aspect
and frequency are we discussing?

No, I have not seen the plots, but looking at, for instance the
forward aspect, the inlets and turbine blades are going to light up a
radar at quite a range.


You mean before or after the redesign to eliminate just that hotspot?


What "redesign"? (not being sarky here, I would really like to know
:-))

Equivalent value, the Raptor is outnumbered: it's better but not _that_
much better.

On current trends the RAF will get more Typhoons than the USAF will
Raptors...


They will need them.


Why? Are we expecting to fight F-22s?


No, that would be suicidal. But you will need at least five Typhoons
to equal one F-22.

Al Minyard